BUT. Honestly

Clarity without the comfort

Honest writing by Nicola Mustone on the messy overlap between humans and tech.

Learning to Care Without Feeling It

Learning to Care Without Feeling It

Time to Read

7–10 minutes
No comments on Learning to Care Without Feeling It
Quick Summary
  • Curiosity can be practiced intentionally, even when it doesn’t come naturally.
  • Empathy is often a learned behavior, not just a feeling, and can start by “faking” it well.
  • Systems and small structures help keep you caring and curious when your emotions are quiet.
  • Detachment can be a strength when it protects your energy while still letting you show up for others.
Table of Contents

What happens when caring isn’t natural, but still necessary?

There are days when I know I should care — about a project, a person, a conversation — and yet nothing moves. The switch stays off. I can see what needs to be done, and I understand why it matters, but there’s no spark behind it.

Living with ADHD, emotional regulation can be unpredictable—it’s not distraction but disconnection. The brain goes quiet, and emotion doesn’t show up when it’s supposed to. I used to fight that silence, as if I could force myself to care through sheer willpower, until I learned it was part of my rhythm. Caring, or at least acting as if you care, isn’t something you force once; it’s something you practice over time.

That’s how I learned to care without feeling it.

an empty chair and an empty desk in an empty room

Practicing Curiosity

Curiosity wasn’t always part of me, and it still isn’t, at least not all the time. It’s always been part of the job though. Whether writing code, helping customers, or leading a team, curiosity was required. It just took me longer to understand it as something I could practice intentionally, not just use instinctively.

It surprised me how deliberate curiosity can be. It doesn’t always start with interest; sometimes it starts with attention.
When I don’t feel engaged, I start small. I ask one question. Then another. Sometimes I ask out of habit, sometimes just to keep the conversation alive.
Every once in a while, one of those questions sparks something real.

Over time, I realized that curiosity in ADHD works like a feedback loop: the more I engage, the more interest returns. It’s a mechanical entry point that becomes genuine the moment it connects to something alive in another person.

a looping visual of ripples in water

Leadership and Adaptation

In leadership, I’ve learned to value both reliability and change — a kind of leadership empathy that balances consistency with flexibility. I like being someone people can count on, but I also need variety to stay awake. The balance lives somewhere between being predictable in principle and flexible in method.

When you lead, curiosity isn’t optional. It’s how you keep understanding the people you work with instead of assuming you already do. I don’t always feel curious, but I know what happens when I stop asking questions: I lose context, I lose perspective, and eventually I lose the connection that makes people feel safe to speak up.

So I keep the structure that keeps me curious: small systems that remind me to check in, take notes, follow up. Not because I require the reminders to care, but because I need help accessing that care consistently.
Sometimes a nudge is all that stands between detachment and engagement.

“Systems preserve what feelings forget.”

Learning Empathy When You Don’t Feel It

Curiosity wasn’t the first thing I had to learn. Before that, it was empathy.

Between 2016 and 2020, when I was closer to web development, my team lead was Job Thomas. I was still a developer at heart. I’d been switched to support at a previous job not because I wanted to, but because I was good at it. My mindset back then was simple: if your site is broken, it’s probably your fault. And often, I was right.

The problem was, being right didn’t help anyone feel heard. I struggled to connect with customers because I didn’t feel their frustration, I only saw the logic of their mistake.
Job noticed. After trying nicely and indirectly multiple times, he finally said it straight: “I don’t care if you don’t care. Fake it.” (I’m paraphrasing).

That moment changed me. It was my first real lesson in learning empathy as a skill, not as a personality trait.

He didn’t mean “pretend to be nice.” He meant that empathy isn’t always a feeling; it’s a behavior.
People didn’t always need me to fix their issue first, they needed to know I understood it mattered to them. They needed validation before resolution.

So I started faking empathy. I mirrored tone. I acknowledged frustration. I treated their issue as if it were my own, even when it wasn’t. Over time, I got better at it.
Repetition trained recognition. I learned to read emotion, even if I couldn’t feel it.

“Understanding without feeling is still understanding.”

I still don’t absorb emotions easily. I don’t cry with people, and I rarely feel what they feel. But I can understand what they’re feeling, and that’s enough to respond with care.
I still don’t know why I am like this. Maybe it’s ADHD, possibly it’s one of my saboteurs, or perhaps I’m just a jerk.

That distinction — between emotional absorption and cognitive empathy — is one of the most useful things I’ve learned.
It helps during difficult moments: performance feedback, terminations, conflict. It keeps me grounded and fair. It also means I can disconnect from work when I need to, which I see as a strength.

Of course, it’s not perfect. That detachment can come across as cold. I’ve been called blunt, direct, and even harsh. I’ve learned to soften when I can, and others have learned not to take my clarity personally. Executives usually appreciate it; peers sometimes need time.
Sometimes I think I sound like an old professor or a harsh parent, the kind who says, “One day you’ll thank me.” Perhaps they’re right.

If I emotionally care about someone, it’s rare, and it means something. It’s not casual or performative; it’s deliberate.
Empathy, for me, isn’t emotional contagion. It’s precision. It’s understanding enough to act responsibly without being consumed.

And it all started with faking it.

person holding eyeglasses
Photo by Josh Calabrese on Unsplash

Practicing Curiosity in Support

That same lesson carried into how I approach customer support. It also changed how I see expertise. That professional empathy often means asking questions you already know the answer to, just to help others discover it for themselves.

When a user says, “I want to make more sales,” or “My site isn’t working,” they’re not telling you the full story. Staying curious means looking past the surface to find what they actually need.

For them, it’s a first. For me, it’s the thousandth time. That gap is what I have to bridge every day, and it’s also what makes me an expert. After fourteen years in customer support, I’ve seen what works and what doesn’t. I recognize patterns, ideas, and needs before customers even name them. They see their problem; I see the landscape.

Sometimes I don’t feel naturally interested in the issue, but I know the person on the other side does.

“Experience teaches you what to see; empathy teaches you to keep looking.”

That’s reason enough to ask another question.

  • Why is this important to them right now?
  • What are they not saying yet?
  • What would make this easier for them next time?

That small act of investigation is how curiosity builds momentum. You don’t wait for interest; you build it through context.
Every conversation is a chance to uncover something someone doesn’t yet know they can do. That’s how curiosity turns into service. That’s how good support turns into an outstanding customer experience.

The Balance of Detachment

The more I’ve led, the more I’ve realized that emotional detachment isn’t the absence of care. It’s a different form of it.
It’s the ability to separate what matters from what’s urgent. To focus on solving problems instead of spiraling with them.

I don’t see it as a flaw anymore. I see it as a boundary that lets me stay effective.
It’s what allows me to hold empathy without drowning in it, to stay curious without burning out.

What matters is balance, knowing when to step closer and when to stay still.
Leadership often means knowing when to listen to the complaint and when to ask what they will do about it.

silhouette of a man standing on a rock at sunset
Photo by Aziz Acharki on Unsplash

When Curiosity Shifts

Curiosity isn’t constant. It shifts depending on energy, context, and connection. The goal isn’t to keep it alive at all times; it’s to design your work so that it can return when it fades.

Here’s what helps me:

  • Ask before assuming. Curiosity lives in the space between what you think you know and what you actually don’t.
  • Write things down as questions, not checkboxes. It keeps me thinking instead of just executing.
  • If you’re bored, find the missing context. Ask who benefits, what it enables, or why it matters.
  • Reframe dull work through someone else’s eyes. If I can’t care for my own sake, I can usually care for someone else’s outcome.

Curiosity doesn’t depend on mood. It depends on design; on building small ways for it to find you again.

Showing Up Anyway

There are still days when caring doesn’t come. When curiosity feels mechanical and empathy feels forced. When the system runs, but I don’t.

Those moments used to frustrate me. Now I see them differently. For me, caring isn’t always a feeling. Sometimes it’s an action. If I can’t feel it for the work itself, I can still feel it for the person it matters to.

That’s what I hold onto as a lead, as a colleague, and as a human trying to stay connected: if I don’t care about it, they care — and I care about them.

Share This Essay

Read the Comments

Leave an Honest Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Stay in the Loop

1–4 emails per month. Unsubscribe anytime.

Discover more from BUT. Honestly

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading